• Subject: Field reference file follow up FPOTYP
  • From: "George Varvaressos" <gvarvaressos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:56:19 +1100
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gvarvaressos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gvarvaressos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:date:subject:to:from:message-id; bh=zhSSzuXICLIGVXXgBUDMnx58FFOwvkmz4BZsshfgG3o=; b=vkzvZpKb2NES5HV/JitpM9OK1nwg1h6qZ2a+EF9VEp2fgpfq4ELZ0WSiFcVSa3fSCv HVJ0igohUoA7muOfhJPpTVI6jXYIRn4E3UECQV5nY5MbzTdHA3SVORKP4CCTwPVU/Mj+ zYcYTKptBA5XtZ2qDwzuIHti3UhIc5eDpNJNqVIOPR89KCJfNGYgrMse70v26C7+4f6+ V5qcPpJ7kuQDwxAG+tP5iQdV7eLUwMTlzaAICql33l65/fo+3Ml772dKqutZowt5RXiT W0gOdJww06Gsn6wA3BNbQFgDUyphYIu1rHS37t65RhLKShlfwDX73uZunwuTsRJ0x/Uc ehYA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548111381; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lIsKQFwoZSozvsfogSCr1n3Z96UWDc6Rn2IvDffXCCXQv10nuZZztbI1FZVqnbBT// dVZm2lEfhuLSpID6hO7a9hTVZ6YQVBfFCuzY0l/gZXYqgFSJ6pofsbmP2guO/fvNZPmK MYTrnf0WjN2lq39fkJKf+HIQ1mDR+5qzaWY2oW0SA+ghhIOijbFliIppCN6h+xLPkBVC +532SJGkKYoli2q8f0gavm7J1I74cAg95yfUyUYQSpiWRyVFREEDfJOBNrKLuQ6liiVI kTmh81z10rAsDM12aHkHA+QpZoXJUnXve4Av1WpFKJa6ZgnYZlVsJUNw5kKx22JL6gt4 mypg==
  • List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l/>
  • List-help: <mailto:bpcs-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
  • List-id: BPCS ERP System <bpcs-l.lists.midrange.com>
  • List-post: <mailto:bpcs-l@lists.midrange.com>
  • List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l>, <mailto:bpcs-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
  • List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/bpcs-l>, <mailto:bpcs-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

It should. A field reference file would have had an appropriate name
and a list of values.
The point is a single source of knowledge - that was there selling
Some places had a full time DBA and it worked but you needed a bigger
staff than most clients could afford.
It was an overhead and an approach that didn't match the client's
Problem was calling it a S/38. Should have been the AS/400 from the
start to show it was something completely different.
Thanks again.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.