×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
The way to fix that is to use the HPH file as a starting point and then
compare data in all the dependent files to HPH. If there is no match, then
archive the dependent file record(s). Locksmith software does that. It works
equally well in the other principle business processes.
(www.unbeatenpath.com/software/locksmith/archiving.pdf )
It's conceivable that the problems that Al and Dick cite were caused because
at some prior time, an analyst decided to purge HPH records without knowing
all the places to look for dependent data. Locksmith archiving software
arrives with all of those data dependencies pre-configured. In the case of
customer orders, I believe at least 13 dependent files are involved. So, it's
no small trick to avoid a case of BPCS/ERP LX data orphans when you purge.
From: On Behalf Of Bailey, Dick
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:41 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] 405CD HPO HPH
Al - How about PO Notes, file ASN? We deleted some old PO history at one
point and when we reused PO numbers, the original notes were attached to
them. Made for considerable confusion. Had to delete the notes too.
Sounds a bit similar.
Dick Bailey
MCFA, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: On Behalf Of Al
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:11 AM
To: 'BPCS ERP System'
Subject: [BPCS-L] 405CD HPO HPH
I have found suspected file corruption & want to confirm my understanding
before deleting what is not wanted.
One problem found are records in HPO for order #s, for which there is no
corresponding HPH summary record.
HPO is supposed to contain detail lines of PO or Requisitions, and a unique
line #, which ties into count of line #s in HPH, so if we were to delete HPO
lines, we would need to revise corresponding HPH count of lines. There's not
supposed to be anything else in HPO than PO lines and Requisition lines.
HPH is supposed to have one header summary record per valid PO or
Requisition. So there would be no harm to BPCS by removing any HPO records
which do not have a corresponding HPH header for the same PO?
If we manually removed HPO records, outside of BPCS programs, there would be
no need to run any reorganization programs to get other files totals in sync
with remaining HPH HPO records? The normal MRP, end fiscal, would straighten
everything out?
-Al Mac-
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.