Am I dreaming that they are actually doing this ????


The reason for the clause is to protect the intellectual property of
Infor and to keep it from being moved to locations which are not
licensed for the software.

The requirement to resolve this is not for Amerequip to move the
software back to the licensed location as the software is already out of
compliance and that will not resolve the compliancy.

What is required is for Amerequip to either furnish documentation that
granted them the rights to move the software to the new facility or, if
none can be provided, for Amerequip to pay a transfer fee to license the
software to the new site and resolve the compliancy issue with the
software being installed at an un-licensed site.

Please let me know if Amerequip can furnish this documentation so we can
determine our next step in resolving this issue.

-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf
Of Michael Ryan
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:18 PM
To: 'BPCS ERP System'
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Has anyone gone through this with Infor?

The wording can be taken two ways depending on how your looking at it.
At could mean where the computer and software resides or At could means
where the functionality of the software is in user by the users.

Infor is loosing their shirts and are trying to squeeze the customers.
It may be time to evaluate options

-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of lwl
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:59 PM
To: 'BPCS ERP System'
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Has anyone gone through this with Infor?

Never been through this with Infor but have done the dance with another
The issue is always the wording " the location specified in
Specifically it's the word "at".

The way the agreement is worded the software can be used for _ALL_

When I pointed out to the sales VP that if I moved the server back to
original location I could use the software at any and all of my
locations they quickly accepted an addendum to the contract specify
"..._for_ the location specified in Scheduled A."

Roy Luce

Direct: 847-540-9635
800-913-PLUS (7587)
Cell: 847-910-0884
Email: rluce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of Don
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 5:21 PM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] Has anyone gone through this with Infor?

We moved our Iseries to a different plant of ours - 3 miles away. Same
company, same Iseries, same BPCS version. Nothing else was changed???

Below is a response after we have complied with an Infor audit in

The contract restricts the use of BPCS to the location 1711 Wisconsin
/ New Holstein WI 53061 through the following language in the attached
2. LICENSE. In consideration for the license fee specified in Schedule
SSA grants to CLIENT a perpetual, personal, nontransferable and
non-exclusive right to use the SOFTWARE, only on the computer specified
Schedule A or an identical computer that is a direct and single
for it, and only at the location specified in Schedule A. The SOFTWARE
be used only for the benefit of CLIENT and its subsidiaries.
I need to determine if Amerequip might have any documentation that would
have granted them the rights to move the software to the new location.
so, we can use that to resolve this issue. If not, we will have to
what the required resolution is to get the license back into compliance.

Don F. Cavaiani
IT Manager
Amerequip Corp.

"It's amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the
credit." Harry S. Truman

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.