Dan,
I am not using ROBOT. we just use the Job Scheduling.
------------------------------
date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:44:31 -0400
from: Dan Sweeney <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] ORD680B
Steve,
If you are trying to automate ORD680B via the robot scheduler, ROBOT has a
"learn function" that will allow you to turn on the learn function and it
will record all of the correct parameters and create the necessary batch
job that you can schedule by calling ORD680D in the learn mode.
Hope that this helps.
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Steve_Delooz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 8:06 AM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] ORD680B
Hi all,
I am trying to automate the Order Hold Mass Release.
Could anyone give me the correct parameters i need to call ORD680B?
Thanks
{-A Schulman DISCLAIMER-}
The contents of this e-mail and its attachments is confidential, may be
legally privileged, and is for the use of the intended recipient only.
Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by
anyone else is prohibited.
If received in error, please delete and e-mail confirmation to the sender.
A.Schulman does not guarantee that the information sent and/or received by
or with this e-mail is correct and does not accept any liability for
damages related thereto.
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
message: 3
date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:40:27 -0500
from: Billt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
subject: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
Can anyone tell me how to exclude an allocatable netable warehouse from
the Facility MRP run? We have a used equipment warehouse that orders are
being placed against but it shows as a facility requirement in the MRP
run
even though it is allocated to that order. It treats all orders as a
"pool" from one facility that all warehouses pull from which is not
acceptable when product is available in that respective warehouse.
------------------------------
message: 4
date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:58:31 -0400
from: Dan Sweeney <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
The hard allocations are not looked as part of the MRP execution. They are
there for the sole purpose of locking inventory to satisfy the
customer/shop order requirements.
I don't believe that there is a good clean way to exclude a warehouse from
an MRP run. You might want to try and make it non-netable, execute MRP and
then change it back (just a thought). I strongly suggest executing this
solution in a test environment FIRST.
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Billt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:40 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
Can anyone tell me how to exclude an allocatable netable warehouse from
the Facility MRP run? We have a used equipment warehouse that orders are
being placed against but it shows as a facility requirement in the MRP
run
even though it is allocated to that order. It treats all orders as a
"pool" from one facility that all warehouses pull from which is not
acceptable when product is available in that respective warehouse.
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
message: 5
date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:02:50 -0500
from: Billt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
We have tried both ways and it made no difference.
-----bpcs-l-bounces+billt=labconco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: BPCS ERP System <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Dan Sweeney <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+billt=labconco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 07/17/2009 09:58AM
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
The hard allocations are not looked as part of the MRP execution. They
are there for the sole purpose of locking inventory to satisfy the
customer/shop order requirements.
I don't believe that there is a good clean way to exclude a warehouse
from an MRP run. You might want to try and make it non-netable,
execute
MRP and then change it back (just a thought). I strongly suggest
executing this solution in a test environment FIRST.
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[[1]mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Billt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:40 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
Can anyone tell me how to exclude an allocatable netable warehouse
from
the Facility MRP run? We have a used equipment warehouse that orders
are
being placed against but it shows as a facility requirement in the
MRP
run
even though it is allocated to that order. It treats all orders as a
"pool" from one facility that all warehouses pull from which is not
acceptable when product is available in that respective warehouse.
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: [2]
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at [3]
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: [4]
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at [5]
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: billt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
References
Visible links
1. mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2.
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
3.
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l
4.
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
5.
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l
------------------------------
message: 6
date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:11:31 -0400
from: Dan Sweeney <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
Then the best solution in my opinion is to move that special warehouse to a
separate facility where MPS/MRP aren't executed. If you need to move the
inventory in the used equipment warehouse into your main facility to
satisfy customer/shop orders then you'd need to execute warehouse/facility
transfers using INV510.
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Billt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:03 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
We have tried both ways and it made no difference.
-----bpcs-l-bounces+billt=labconco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: BPCS ERP System <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Dan Sweeney <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+billt=labconco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 07/17/2009 09:58AM
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
The hard allocations are not looked as part of the MRP execution. They
are there for the sole purpose of locking inventory to satisfy the
customer/shop order requirements.
I don't believe that there is a good clean way to exclude a warehouse
from an MRP run. You might want to try and make it non-netable,
execute
MRP and then change it back (just a thought). I strongly suggest
executing this solution in a test environment FIRST.
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[[1]mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Billt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:40 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: [BPCS-L] Warehouse within a facility
Can anyone tell me how to exclude an allocatable netable warehouse
from
the Facility MRP run? We have a used equipment warehouse that orders
are
being placed against but it shows as a facility requirement in the
MRP
run
even though it is allocated to that order. It treats all orders as a
"pool" from one facility that all warehouses pull from which is not
acceptable when product is available in that respective warehouse.
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: [2]
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at [3]
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: [4]
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at [5]
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: billt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
References
Visible links
1. mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2.
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
3.
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l
4.
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
5.
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
message: 7
date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:20:48 -0400
from: "DeeDee Virgei" <DeeDee.Virgei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] ORD680B and RBTSTRLRN
Hi,
Thought I'd sneak in another question on this...
I recently switched to ROBOT Scheduler and started using the 'learn
function', RBTSTRLRN (excellent command!), and sometimes w/ OPAL
statements, to automate some of the other BPCS programs...
My question is, has anyone used this command with PUR900 and/or INV900
(month-end close jobs)? We are on BPCS 405CD...
Thx!
Best Regards,
DeeDee Virgei
Project Leader
Nelson Stud Welding, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+deedee.virgei=nelsonstud.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+deedee.virgei=nelsonstud.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Dan Sweeney
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 9:45 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] ORD680B
Steve,
If you are trying to automate ORD680B via the robot scheduler, ROBOT has
a "learn function" that will allow you to turn on the learn function and
it will record all of the correct parameters and create the necessary
batch job that you can schedule by calling ORD680D in the learn mode.
Hope that this helps.
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Steve_Delooz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 8:06 AM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] ORD680B
Hi all,
I am trying to automate the Order Hold Mass Release.
Could anyone give me the correct parameters i need to call ORD680B?
Thanks
{-A Schulman DISCLAIMER-}
The contents of this e-mail and its attachments is confidential, may be
legally privileged, and is for the use of the intended recipient only.
Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by
anyone else is prohibited.
If received in error, please delete and e-mail confirmation to the
sender.
A.Schulman does not guarantee that the information sent and/or received
by or with this e-mail is correct and does not accept any liability for
damages related thereto.
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message
email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message
email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
Delivered-To: deedee.virgei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) digest list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
End of BPCS-L Digest, Vol 7, Issue 98
*************************************
{-A Schulman DISCLAIMER-}
The contents of this e-mail and its attachments is confidential, may be
legally privileged, and is for the use of the intended recipient only.
Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by
anyone else is prohibited.
If received in error, please delete and e-mail confirmation to the sender.
A.Schulman does not guarantee that the information sent and/or received by
or with this e-mail is correct and does not accept any liability for
damages related thereto.
midrange.com
