× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. BPCS-L
  3. December 2006

Re: 3 way mismatch

Hello

The 3WM as standard is from V8.1, with ACP500 from PUR550. 

On Standard 6.1 no control (except P.O. Nr)is done for Qty and Val. 
All the handling has to be done "manually".

Ask to your INFOR representative for a module (Italian standard module) on this 
argument, if you need on V6.1.x.

Thanks
Regards    

Davide Roveda 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+davide.roveda=infor.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+davide.roveda=infor.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Indah
Sent: lunedì 18 dicembre 2006 3.49
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] 3 way mismatch

Al,

I'm using version 6.1.02.
In my experience using BPCS 3-way match, BPCS only check quantity matching.
So invoice amount / Amount to Cost can be different with calculation
Received Qty x PO price.

regards,
Indah

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.