× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Deb,

I worked with a client that had the same problem. They produced the same 
item number at two different locations, and each had unique costs (one 
location used an aluminum can, the other a steel can). Where it really 
gets "fuzzy" is when you ship product from both locations to a 
distribution warehouse. Now how do you separate the costs? What they did 
was to use a unique lot number designation (the first digit represented 
the manufacturing location) to identify the originating manufacturing 
location/cost. This could have a subtle effect on fifo, but other than 
using a suffix number at the end of the item number to create unique 
items/costs, this was the only workable solution for them.




"Deb Newcomb-Burke" <debnewcomb-burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+fcdavy=sealinfo.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
10/11/2005 03:42 PM
Please respond to
"SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: [BPCS-L] (no subject)






Ron,

The mfg costs are captured properly.  Our problem is that regardless of
the components or mfg location, all are using the same F/G item number.
So, we have xxx product in our finished goods warehouse with multiple
costs.  Once we generate a customer order, we allocate by lot for FIFO.
At this point we really don't know how much that particular item costs
for a true margin picture

Deb Newcomb-Burke
IT Director - Alba/Tefron-USA
828-879-6518
336-682-4493 - cell
240-306-2681 - efax
debnewcomb-burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+debnewcomb-burke=tefronusa.net@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+debnewcomb-burke=tefronusa.net@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ronald Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:35 PM
To: 'SSA's BPCS ERP System'
Subject: RE: [BPCS-L] (no subject)

The only way to capture actual costs is from the closed shop orders.
+With their being at different locations, then the actual costs will
change with each shop order closed.

 
Ron Smith
704/864-2499    (home office)
704/674-1121      (mobile)
704/864-3431     (fax)


-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+rsmith17=carolina.rr.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+rsmith17=carolina.rr.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Deb Newcomb-Burke
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:08 PM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] (no subject)


 

To All,

 

We have a situation where a single product can be made at several
locations around the world.  The manufacturing location has a direct
bearing on the mfg cost.  Within these locations the product can be made
of cotton or polyester which also is reflected on the cost.  We are
manufacturing all of the different scenarios with alternate BOM methods
and corresponding alternate routing method.  My question is how can we
capture the actual cost so a true margin can be calculated for customer
orders?

 

 

Deb Newcomb-Burke

IT Director - Alba/Tefron-USA

828-879-6518

336-682-4493 - cell

240-306-2681 - efax

debnewcomb-burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

 



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.