|
Yes. Read the attached bulletin. If you already applied 14837 permanently, then you can not remove it. We are going to apply PTF/FIX # MF34800. We just received it. We did not experience the high CPU% as some of IBM's other users, but we did note that logicals with select/omits were affected. In some cases, creating an index (identical to the logical) helped. We also noted performance issues in pick release and order entry. We are MM 6.1.02, 9/03 BMR bundle applied. Mark -----Original Message----- From: bpcs-l-bounces+richarma=hartcool.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+richarma=hartcool.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rkonda Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:23 PM To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [BPCS-L] BPCS 604 x V5R2 OS/400 Hi Everybody, We'd changed the OS/400 version from v5r1 to v5r2 and after that our BPCS programs had a performance problem in several applications. We are in BPCS 6004 MM. Did anybody have the same problem ? We already saw the IBM APAR, PTF SI14837 apllied, and DB PTF is in 17 level. Thanks in advance. Renato
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.