× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Yes.  Read the attached bulletin.  If you already applied 14837
permanently, then you can not remove it.

We are going to apply PTF/FIX # MF34800.  We just received it.  We did
not experience the high CPU% as some of IBM's other users, but we did
note that logicals with select/omits were affected.  In some cases,
creating an index (identical to the logical) helped.

We also noted performance issues in pick release and order entry.

We are MM 6.1.02, 9/03 BMR bundle applied.


Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+richarma=hartcool.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+richarma=hartcool.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
rkonda
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:23 PM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] BPCS 604 x V5R2 OS/400

Hi Everybody, 

We'd changed the OS/400 version from v5r1 to v5r2 and after that our
BPCS programs had a performance problem in several applications. 

We are in BPCS 6004 MM. 

Did anybody have the same problem ? 

We already saw the IBM APAR, PTF SI14837 apllied, and DB PTF is in 17
level. 

Thanks in advance. 

Renato 

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.