Re: Sox&BPCS -- BPCS-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Danny ...

We passed our first Sarbanes Oxley audit in December with flying colors. 
It was a LOT of work, but the work was on the development side ... change 
control, developer access to objects, etc.  ... nothing to do with BPCS. 
(And we are on 4.05 ... not a particularly current version!)  The only 
thing they really questioned about BPCS was the fact that that release 
runs with users having all object authority, but once we documented for 
them that that was a requirement of the software, and that we control the 
risks by the other security features we have in place (users not having 
command line access, etc.), that was acceptable.  Is there something in 
particular your auditors are questioning, with regards to BPCS?

Lisa D. Abney
Manager Development Support
Sensient Technology
Phone:  (317) 240-1418



bpcs-l-bounces+lisa.abney=sensient-tech.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 
02/22/2005 12:50:28 PM:

> Hi Guys
> can you please share (who ever is in Compliance ) with me the pros and 
> cons and any issues that you had to go thru to get that Compliance ,
>   no consultant puff  Please..
> Danny Monselise
>

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.