Re: CMF costs of 999999999

["Ganesh Linguram Bharade" <g_bharade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

  Hi,
   
Its my guess that the onhand qty might have become 0= due to qty is
   reversed (returned to supplier) or adjustment txn performed.   Subsequently, 
the std. cost, which in your case might be based on
   weighted= avg., is calculated as infinity 9999999999(as the denominator in
   weighted = avg. formula is current onhand= 0)
   

   
Regards,
   
Ganesh
   = 

   

   

   
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 Downes Marian wrote :
   
&gt= ;
   
>HI ,
   
>
   
>We have items on  our CMF file w= ith costs of 999999999, also the C
   
>transaction for the same item = on the ITH  also has a standard cost
   of
   
>99999999. I can not = see where this 9999999 value  is coming from ,
   has
   
>anyone el= se ever had this problem?
   
>
   
>
   
>
   
>Best r= egards
   
>
   
>            &nbsp= ; Marian
   
>
   
>
   
>
   
>Marian Downes
   
&gt= ;Systems Analyst / Programmer
   
>ABS Pumps Ltd
   
>Clonard Roa= d
   
>Wexford
   
>Ireland
   
>
   
>Tel.   &nbs= p;       +353 53 63262
   
>Fax    &nbsp= ;     +353 53 63290
   
>E-mail     &nbs= p;    Marian.Downes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   
>
   
>Visit us at= www.abspumps.com
   
>
   
>
   
>
   
>
   
><BR= >
>Your mail has been scanned by Trend Micro InterScan for
   viruses.<BR= >
>_______________________________________________
   
>This is t= he SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
   
>To post a message = email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change l= ist options,
   
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bp= cs-l
   
>or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   
>Before posti= ng, please take a moment to review the archives
   
>at http://archive= .midrange.com/bpcs-l.
   
>
   



   


   
[IMG]