|
Hello Roger, You made me curious on how 'No. Operators' impacts standards... I changed a part on our test side, #of run operator from 1 to 2 then re-rolled it's standard cost on that part; ended up no impact, i.e. this level labor cost was .00366 and still is... Hope this helps. Good luck. DeeDee -----Original Message----- From: Roger.Henady@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Roger.Henady@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 5:58 PM To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: CST600 - BPCS 405CD How does the #of run operators effect the load standards? Seems like we are missing labor. Reading the help text on routing maintenance, it says the rate is divided by the number of operator for backwards scheduling. Roger Henady Thorco Industries (417) 682-1340 _______________________________________________ This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
