×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Your idea would not work for us, because our BOM has several levels of
sub-assemblies, and common components shared with many finished goods. Our
setup time is critical. We think we know our costs and rates, but we need
to track actual in parallel with standard to find out where we do not know
as well as we thought we did. Also we have very short lead times.
We need to process shop orders on the components for the purpose of having
an accurate inventory on our manufactured components and raw
materials. Cost of Goods Sold is not the only reason to have labor
reporting ... inventory accuracy is more important to us. But if you have
no need for inventory accuracy, or if your product structure is such that
you not need to track inventory consumption, through BPCS, perhaps this
idea might work.
Let's suppose that you do need to account for the materials used up when
you manufacture your finished goods ... you might consider what I believe
is called a FLAT STRUCTURE.
In our case we have finished wiring harnesses that have a hundred wires in
them, those wires were made as separate leads, then combined into
sub-assemblies that have a few wires, with several steps, in which
intermediate steps are discrete items. So our BOM has several levels.
But if you are somehow able to do your product structure so that there are
no intermediate items between raw and finished, then when you receive
finished product, do transaction that consumes all the materials that must
have been needed to make that end item.
In fact this way you could also do away with shop orders.
That way you would get your inventory accurate, and book standard hours for
financials.
Now depending on the kind of business you are ... you could go to jail for
this.
Because how do you know if your standards are any good?
And even if you can get away with it, the company could go bankrupt because
you no longer have any idea of your true costs, scrap, setup, indirect time.
, you wrote:
Hi All,
We are a manufacturing comapany using BPCs full client server version
6.1.01 without modifications.
Currently today the bpcs system is settup to report labour tickets
against shop order operations and the financials use
the actual hours booked for analysis.
Management have asked if the following is achievable,
No longer report labour tickets, just book the finished goods into stock
and use the std hours for financial reporting
is this achievable , if so will the shop orders close automatically , are
ther any gotcha,s
Brgds Patrick
_______________________________________________
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.