×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
We are 405 CD Mixed Mode make-to-order
We have safety stock.
We do not have the shop orders auto generated from the sales orders.
The way safety stock works for us.
(a) there are raw materials whose lead time for us is longer than the lead
time our customers expect from us, so MRP reorders raw materials leaving us
with enough on-hand to handle the short lead time customers
(b) we have customers who expect us to ship to them as soon as they are
about to run-out, so we have safety stock of their finished goods ... as
soon as the customer supply dips below that quantity, MRP reorders to fill
the gap
When we release the orders, it is up to us what quantity to make, so we not
do tiny quantities, but enough to be efficient.
Now we are using simple fixed human managed safety stock values.
I have argued, and failed to convince, that we ought to be using dynamic
safety stock around our customer seasonal needs, so as not to tie up
company funds for inventory on parts not needed year round.
I have also argued that we ought to consider minimum order quantity policy,
on those sub-assemblies where the setup is such that tiny orders will
cripple us on cost.
Thus we too have multiple challenges that various people thinking about and
suggesting solutions, that have not achieved sufficient consensus to implement.
We also have a QC requirement to retain a tiny sample of some parts made so
that in the event of a legal question months or years down the road, we can
show what this or that part was like when we were making it. The way we
handle that is for the production people to deliberately make more than the
shop order calls for, and through labor to report the QC excess as
scrap. I fear that with employee turn-over, and recession cutting into
training dollars, that the various kinds of things supposed to be reported
as scrap, that are not scrap, may be slipping and perhaps we need to
rethink this and come up with some new kinds of ITE transactions and
reporting method steps to add granularity to our scrap reporting. It ought
to be somewhat predictable how much of this was created, based on how many
shop order customer order delivery date runs, so that then we can see where
reporting fell down.
A question for you ... how fast is the shop order paperwork in your hands
after the customer order is entered? The way we do things we have minimum
of 24 hour lag after customer order entered, and given the shortness of
lead times of some customers wanting stuff from us 5 days after order
placed, this is potentially a serious problem.
Customer Order comes in day-1
that evening I run rull generation MRP CAP and also MRP250 to spool file
every other day, production control prints that MRP250 report and uses it
to generate needed shop orders
this means that potentially a customer order due in 5 days does not start
production until 2 days before it is due, and it has many sub-assemblies.
Exception to this is when customer service communicates with production
control to say that this or that item needs to be made faster than the
normal MRP processing cycle, so shop orders are released manually, on those
rush customer items. This is not as efficient as doing it through MRP, so
we cannot be doing that for lots of items.
The way you doing things, how do you get the shop paperwork off of the shop
orders launched by customer orders ... do you automatically get SFC520 from
them, and are this a pile of tiny print runs where you can release to print
continuously one behind the other without printer alignment hassles on each
batch? Or does some person have to manually do stuff to get the shop
paperwork on the automatically released shop orders?
Also can this be seton selectively ... only do it on the customer items
where lead time for those customers is so short that this would be helpful?
Hello,
I have a couple of questions regarding the auto generation of shop orders
from sales order entry.
Our company has just turned this feature on, and we are having some issues
with the process.
First, it seems as though a shop order generates even if you have sufficient
inventory for an item. Is there a way to tell the system to only generate a
shop order if you do not have enough material to ship?
Next, we require that a retainer sample for each blend produced to be kept
in the lab. Therefore, we must create an additional .06 lb for the retainer.
Is there a way to have BPCS add this quantity to the amount of the shop
order being generated?
Next, we would prefer to have the lot# pre-assigned on our shop orders.
Currently, we are revising the shop order and changing the flag to
pre-assign before releasing the computer generated shop order. Is there a
setup parameter to change which will automatically set the pre-assign lot
number flag to yes?
Thank you for your help.
Ted
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.