Re: ACR900 Date of 00/00/00

[Mhamilton8685@xxxxxxx]

What you should find is that the first submission of ACR900 did not cause any 
harm.  It would not have deleted or closed any AR Invoices.  The second, 
however would have taken care of the invoices, but would have also rolled the 
period buckets again.  They would not have doubled up, but would have moved 
another period back.  Thus your prior period will be zero and last periods data 
will 
be in the second month back.  You will see this problem in SAL300.

Myron Hamilton
COBUS Consulting


In a message dated 9/30/2003 8:09:57 PM Central Daylight Time, 
SomsenJ@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> I am currently processing EOM jobs and I hit enter on ACR900 prior to
> entering the month end date.  The job started before I could end it.  In
> looking through what little documentation I could find, I didn't see that
> this would cause any great problems.  I resubmitted the ACR900 with the
> correct month end date again.  I did not kill the first (wrong) ACR900 job
> as I am not comfortable with what it would do to the system.  Can anyone
> give me a warm fuzzy that the data should be OK?  This would have to be the
> longest job that I run (just over 2.5 hours per run).  I am going forward
> with EOM but not looking forward to the morning.  Silence from accounting
> will mean it worked.  Thanks.
>