|
In message <169.d690e27.2a0c5232@aol.com>, DAsmussen@aol.com writes > >You are correct. Inactive jobs on the iSeries/400 will lose their timeslice >and not impact performance in the least. The only risk you run is exceeding >your "per seat" licensing, which can certainly happen in this instance. What >sort of performance problem are you attempting to solve? There is (at least on 6.0.02 and 6.0.04) a tendency for the Client/Server ALAUNCH jobs to run amok if they get detached from the PC client session. This may be what was referred to. -- Mike Ozanne
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.