|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] We are using loading code 4 both for costing and capacity; however, I'm wondering whether we should change all of them to 0 since we aren't running capacity planning. The reason our engineer was referring to costing is because we now use the cost rollup functionality to roll up the run times for routings for all parts that go into an end item. This data is used independent of BPCS for scheduling. It is very unorthodox, but we are using this end item factor to load different product lines. Different product lines have different criteria such as calenders, capacity, etc. Although we have some of the BPCS scheduling tools, we don't use them because they don't seem to offer the same flexibility. Also, based on the volume of sales orders we have, it isn't very realistic to wait until MRP and capacity planning run to schedule customer orders. I've been looking into the bill of resources functionality. I see where you can identify critical workcenters in CAP100. However, from the archive info it looks like you have to create bills of resources. Does this have to be done on each end item? Is it typical for people to use this only with capacity planning CAP500? Jenny Carr --
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.