|
Roel, Please consider the following: If you set your "Minimum Balance Horizon Days" (for example 30 days) then the system looks at your demand for the next 30 days and determines how much a days' worth of inventory is. The" "Minimum Balance Days" are then set to however many days you want to keep. (Say, 3 days). The concept is that as the demand starts to dwindle, you will be keeping less and less inventory in the three days of minimum. When the demand goes away, so will the amount for the three days of minimum inventory. Using 0 Horizon Days and 0 Minimum Balance Days would mean "I don't want to see any demand and I don't want to keep any days worth of inventory". The trick is to figure out exactly what the best combination of Horizon Days and Minimum Balance Days is for you. The Using 0 Horizon Days and 0 Minimum Balance Days would mean "I don't want to see any demand and I don't want to keep any days worth of inventory"you place the Horizon Days the smoother the demand will be. But you run the risk of extending beyond your known demand. The further in you make the horizon days, the more volatile the demand will be (more peaks and valleys). But you are safer to not running out of stock. Either way the demand will drive the volume of the inventory. I hope this helps in your decision making. I also hope I said this correctly, because it is part of the education that I am doing tomorrow. If you have any questions please, email me at edeharde@execpc.com Warm regards, Ed DeHarde Senior Consulting Director Unbeaten Path International ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roel Bakker" <RBakker@mhimee.nl> To: <BPCS-L@midrange.com> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:23 AM Subject: Fading out products. > Hello fellow BPCS victims. > > We are using BPCS V6.1.1.. > My question: When a parent itemt is fading out / fasing out (let's say > over 1 year); how can we control this easily. > in CIC we are using dynamic minimum stock balances for components. We do > not wish to have obsolete stock after fasing out, but if we put the > balance days = 0 & horizon days = 0 than: > MRP generates inmediately a safety stock = 0, which is of course > dangerous for business, because we still have to deliver for 1 year. > > If we do not change the dynamic safety stock, we run the risk of > obsolete stock, because the vendor lead time to our mother company in > Japan is 3 months. > > Please let me know your advice. > > Thank you in avdance, > > Roel Bakker > Production Planning & Procurement > Turbocharger Division > Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Equipment Europe B.V. > Tel: 0031-36-5388223 > Fax: 0031-36-5388222 > E-mail: rbakker@mhimee.nl > > _______________________________________________ > This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list > To post a message email: BPCS-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/bpcs-l > or email: BPCS-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.