Re: Cost bucket 0

Terri

I'm not familiar with outside operations
but we do sometimes have raw materials that switch between
purchased & manufactured

we CAN make it
we CAN purchase it

based on volumes a decision is made which is the most
cost effective & lead time optimal way to do it.

If you change it to purchased, you need to get rid of the routings
If you make it manufactured, you need to do all the stuff to make it

Basically there are cost elements & sources of cost elements associated with
the other way of doing things & when you convert between how you going to do
it, BPCS does not automatically clean out what is not wanted, you have to
know what is not wanted & you need to get rid of it yourself
If you don't, then your costs can get messed up

When you quoted the before
           3        0            .24363             .00000

Looks to me like that is wrong because it is not the total of
 7.06280
  .11074
  .13289
just the total of the last two

Once your cost buckets out of sync
BPCS programs sees whatever changed to one bucket & also does that to others
so they stay out of sync by same amount

Some human being in your company might have noticed that the costs did not
add up right & fixed them
and you did not know it

I have found that CST100 (which leaves # in ITH)
does not cut it when costs out of sync
it just changes 0 by amount of other thing you changed

There are some BPCS programs at some versions that do not work right if the
contents of the fields are zero ... it is like they hit zero & stop, when in
fact that zero needs to go into some field that is not zero

MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac)

>  Hi,
>       (V6.04, Apr Cum, Mixed mode)
>       I know there has been discussion on cost bucket 0 not the sum of cost
>  buckets 1 - 99 in the past. When we have had this mismatch in the past, the
>  only way to fix it was a fix program to re-sync the buckets. Now something
>  strange has happened.
>       In mid December, an item changed from purchased with an outside
>  operation, no BOM to purchased with an inside operation. After the cost
>  build, the cost looked like this:
>             3        0            .24363             .00000
>             3        1           7.06280             .00000
>             3        3            .11074             .00000
>             3        4            .13289             .00000
>       There was no inventory for this item, so it didn't stand out in any
>  reports.
>       Last week, we had a PO receipt for the item, and it received it at
>  .24363.  When the cost build ran on Sunday, the costs now look like this:
>             3        0           7.30643             .00000
>             3        1           7.06280             .00000
>             3        3            .11074             .00000
>             3        4            .13289             .00000
>       Any ideas on why the cost build correctly calculated cost bucket 0
>  now, and not before? We do a cost build weekly, so it isn't the first build
>  that occurred. The only difference I can see is that now we have inventory
>  on hand.
>  Thanks for any ideas.
>  <===================================================>
>
>  Terri Harteau