|
here is a general overview of our process for dealing with bad parts from vendors.... - all purchased parts are received with a 'u' transaction, even if obviously bad at time of receipt (because an invoice is likely already sitting in our a/p department, and we've found it is easier to let a/p do std processing and then follow up on problems later - which may strike you as odd, but we found that the time wasted due to confusion caused by not receiving the po was extensive / got to be expensive) - when material is found to be non-conforming: - plant notifies buyer via a non-conforming product report, isolates inventory in a non- nettable warehouse/location - buyer notifies vendor, who can decide if they want the parts sent back or scrapped at our facility - buyer updates the non-conforming product report with appropriate disposition, forwards to material handling group - VS transaction performed by materials technician if vendor said scrap parts / VR transaction performed if vendor said return parts - copy of non-conforming product report delivered to a/p department - our company always debits the supplier / takes the value off of the next payment to vendor... we do NOT wait for credit letters from vendors - a/p is able to process against the VR or VS transaction, as it will already be performed in system when they get the non-conforming product report - if more parts are needed, buyer cuts an entirely new purchase order - so our non-conforming product report is the key to the entire process, and includes information like: item # / vendor / qty / po# / non-conformance detail / price ea / etc. we have never had a problem with the vr or vs transaction the transaction we do stay away from is the vc, because we don't want to clutter the po which already had a problem more by getting additional parts / invoices against it bjs "Roel Bakker" <RBakker@mhimee.nl> on 11/15/2001 03:31:27 AM Please respond to bpcs-l@midrange.com To: BPCS-L@midrange.com cc: (bcc: Brett Siikarla/IS/Finance/Corporate/KI-Inc) Subject: How to handle vendor return? Dear BPCS colleagues. We are on BPCS 6.1.1 and are wondering how to handle vendor returns. We believe the VR transaction is useless, as it does not adjust the order and quantity costed (in case an invoice has been received). We are now thinking of using the B transaction for items to be sent back to the supplier: supplier will get a customer number in BPCS. We will make a customer order (with a new order class, recognizable for our Finance Department), pick, ship and send an invoice the supplier instead of wating for an credit note. Please let me know your opinion ( or the method(s) used in your business. Thanx, Roel Bakker Production Planning & Procurement Turbocharger Division MHI Equipment Europe B.V. Tel: 0031-36-5388223 Fax: 0031-36-5388222 E-mail: rbakker@mhimee.nl _______________________________________________ This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message email: BPCS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/bpcs-l or email: BPCS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.