|
Unfortunately your choice of subject does not communicate much meaning to me. I hope it does not set off any alarms with the cyber cops trying to translate some hidden meaning. ;-) We're V405 CD MM on AS/400 & have no virtual stuff, but we have done routings for many many years. We do have some phantoms, primarily engineering changes. We put them in our BOM so that anyone doing inquiry can see the history of changes. In theory they should have no effect on anything other than being this textual assistance. So I cannot address Q1 ... we have no virtual stock in our production process. Q2 is easy. We have routings & BOM describing the parts to be made. We release shop orders to make those parts. The shop order files contain copies of info that came from the routings & BOM. We post transactions to the shop orders reporting WIP so far. These consume the raw materials that are needed to make the parts & record labor & machine costs. When we report the last operation of a shop order, it adds a reciept of the Finished Goods to your inventory. There is a delay in the costs getting from WIP shop orders to master files, which can be a problem depending on your variances. The history files show the actual & standard cost that is in your system AT THE TIME of the transaction, which in our case does have a variance timing problem. We have 4 warehouses per facility. Facility 40 is our Evansville facility. Warehouse 41 is finished goods because type 1 is end items ready for shipping. Warehouse 42 is work-in-process because type 2 is sub-assemblies. Warehouse 47 is our stock room because type 7 is raw materials. Warehouse 49 is for stuff waiting on QC decision what to do about it - perhaps it can be repaired, perhaps it should be scrapped, perhaps a vendor sent us something that we should return for credit. We also have some special IN TRANSIT locations, that correspond to places like DAVE PICKUP TRUCK & JOE VAN where our materials are in an employee vehicle in transit to another facility. All of our facilities use same # system. 1st character identifies the facility 2nd character identifies the type of material in that warehouse. When production of something is to start, the neccessary raw materials are transferred from stock room ... some location in warehouse x7 to some location in x2 close to where the production will begin. We have labor tickets in which one copy is used for the transaction recording how many were made & various related information, and the yellow copy goes with the bin of materials, identifying what it is that was made. When the labor ticket is entered to the system, THE SAME DAY as the production, that consumes the materials, based on how much was made or scrapped, and so forth, so that at the end of each day our inventory transactions should all be caught up, in theory. Each labor ticket that is on an operation that consumes the material does the CI transactions to consume it. Sometimes there is an RJ (reject). Then the last operation generates PR production receipt adding the inventory that was made. We treat the entire shop floor as one humongous location, so we do not have to be transferring WIP inventory around in the computer. So basically there are transactions at 4 stages. The inventory is recieved into the stock room from purchases or DRP transfers or whatever ... that is 1 stage ... straightforward. The inventory is transferred from the stock room to the shop floor WIP warehouse .. we use a T transfer transaction ... I think INV510 The inventory is consumed & manufactured on the shop floor ... we use JIT600. Then it is shipped to the customer. We have the extra step associated with WIP warehouse vs. shipping warehouse. There is nothing to cancel out. We don't do any single issue or multiple issue transactions by INV500. JIT600 takes care of that pretty automatically. There are 3 screens that we use primarily. 1. Identify shop order & quantities & type of labor. 2. The material consumption screen where you can do exceptions (we rarely). 3. The start-stop detail screen because we can have teams or crews & they were not working non-stop. If you are reporting labor via bar coding, it probably goes even more smoothly than the way we doing it. When we manufacture some WIP item (work in progress between raw materials & finished goods), BPCS treats the cost of that item as MATERIALS even though most of the cost might have been LABOR or MACHINE and OVERHEAD, when that item is consumed into the next higher sub-assembly. That is in general terms. Actually it is at production order purge time that the actual costs get updated in shop order sequence. The cost of routings comes from information stored in the shop orders which came from labor reporting through JIT600 or SFC600. The cost of the material comes from the latest information in the cost master for the materials the shop orders recorded as being used, so there is a timing issue depending on the sequence of shop orders released, and how you average costs. For example if you have a small order, that has higher than normal costs due to setup, and if your numbering system is such that shop orders for end items get released before those for components, then you can have the end item purged first using costs from prior production run, followed by purge of components getting the accurate cost based on current run, but then a few weeks later when you making the part again, perhaps with larger quantities & more efficiency of production, the end item purges first using costs from the inefficient run, so BPCS can mix up costs & quantities & give you a distorted picture. This is one of the reasons we run our business primarily using standard costs. brian_pang@sinaman.com writes: > brian_pang@sinaman.com (=?big5?B?YnJpYW5fcGFuZw==?=) > > V6.1.01 MM on AS/400 > > We are now want to apply routings and capacity planning. Of course, we also > need to absorb the related cost into the WIP items. According to the BPCS > documentation (previous version), WIP warehouse(s) and locations are needed. > Then question comes out. Though we know that such WIP warehouses and > locations are virtual, system do not know. Then, from the system point of > view, they are the same as others, e.g. main store. > Q1. Are those WIP whs and locs really virtual and no stock > can exist under them? > Q2. How can we do from the production issue to FG receipt? > If we use single or multiple issue as usual, we just > take those stock out of store. How about the WIP whs? > Do we need to use other transaction type to store in > those components in the WIP whs? If yes, do we use > trans type 'W' (WIP transfer) to trasnfer from one > loc (cost collect points) to another loc? How do we > cancel out those components in WIP whs and loc while > receipting that FG to FG store (use issue w/ receipt)? > > Thanks a trillion for all your support and help. > > Best regards, > Brian Pang MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac) BPCS 405 CD Manager / Programmer @ Global Wire Technologies Incorporated http://www.globalwiretechnologies.com = new name same quality wire engineering company: fax # 812-424-6838
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.