|
As an SSA Hardware affiliate, we can provide you with the SSA's software sizing document, help you fill it out, process it, and advise you on the system recommendations. This will help you determine if your current system meets your future needs. Without that sizing information, why would you replace your current system? Are you having a problem with your end-of-month or do you just want to process it faster? What type of lease do you have? Why wouldn't you look at the 820-2395 CPW 35/370, it is an IBM P10 software class machine and a uni-processor (with a CPW 370 vs. CPW 230 on existing machine), with a lower cost ($47K less than the 820-2396 base system cost). And being at a P10 group allows you to keep Query/400. Otherwise here are a couple of facts: Without adding more users or implementing more modules, most companies that have upgraded from V6.0.02 to V6.1 have not seen much additional system requirements. Companies coming from V4.05CD to V6.xx have required large system upgrades. Actually, V6.1 performance has been good. Migrating older disk to an 8xx does not make sense and cents! Migrating your 3-year old 10 x 4.196GB 7200 RPM drives for a total 33.52GB of disk attached via a slow migration bridge box tower, versus spending an additional $4800 IBM list price for 4x8.58GB 10000 RPM drives for a total of 35GB of disk attached directly on the high speed system bus DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. The additional maintenance on the migration tower with the slower/older disk drives pays for the additional new disk drives in less than 2 years. There are other things a knowledgeable SSA hardware partner can help you with. -----Original Message----- From: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Dennis Munro Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:27 PM To: 'BPCS-L@midrange.com'; 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com' Subject: 820 upgrade from an S20 This message is on the bpcs-l & midrange-l lists so if you have already seen it, sorry. Our lease on an S(as in Sam)20 is due to expire in 4+ months. Our BP was in talking about upgrading it to an 820. This upgrade through the end of November has a 5% rebate plus some other rebates from the BP which would give us a lower monthly lease cost. S20 is a model 2165 with CPW ratings of 49.7 & 464.3. I,024MB of memory & 33.52 GB Raid 5 disk of 10 4.xx GB drives at 7200 rpm(?). Software tier is P10. Drives are about 52 % full. 820 is a model 2396-1521 with CPW ratings of 35 & 950. The 820 migration tower will contain an additional 750 MB of memory & 4 8.5GB 10K rpm drives. Software tier is a P20. Now I will have two "boxes" - the original S20 minus its CPU's plus the 820 "migration" tower. Another 220 outlet required & now I have to look at how much the UPS can handle. It currently has the S20 & a 720 running through it. The serial number will stay the same. We are running BPCS 6.0.02 full client/server with roughly 50 users. We have been live since August of 1998. BPCS software price is user based so the tier change does not affect us. Other 3rd party software is serial number based so no new fees are required there. Disaster recovery services through Sungard will change but I don't know by how much. That we will upgrade to ver. 6.1.x of BPCS within a year is a good possibility & is the 35/950 CPW enough to handle that version of BPCS? The major concern I had was going from two processors down to one. Originally our BPCS users tended to crash & burn more frequent than I liked to see which more than likely hung their job & their processor. Jobs slowed down but we still had another processor working until I could kill the hung job. In the last year or so, we have probably only hung a job/processor once or twice. So the two processor concern seems to be a thing of the past. With two processors, it meant that each CPU was half the total rating - 232 in batch. With the single processor, I will have more than 4 times the CPW rating. Things obviously will not run 4 times faster but they should definitely run faster. I can run month end on my low end 720 test box & it runs quicker than on the S20 production machine which always amazed me until the splitting of the CPW between processors was explained to me. I am exploring the possibility of taking the ILE compiler off the production machine & only leaving it on the test machine which is a P10 software tier. They are in the same room 17" apart. This extra money I would use to buy more memory. I would like to do more with pools & running specific jobs in their own pool so the more memory I have, the more I can partition jobs. Query/400 I would like to also take off because Query/400 & QM/400 each are $3,200.00. I don't know SQL well enough so that is not an option. Although I am converting my queries to QM/400 queries & I will use Interactive SQL to generate "looks" & reports, just not as comfortable with the product. Quick & dirty, I still use Query/400 as a crutch. QM/400 can do the same & more but the using/learning curve is still a struggle. The name of the game is to spend less - that is the mandate from management for the upcoming budget cycle. Does someone have any other suggestion(s)? Also, will the proposed machine handle the latest version of BPCS - be it mixed mode or client/server? Dennis Munro "I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they go flying by." Dilbert's Words Of Wisdom: Badger Mining Corporation www.badgerminingcorp.com dmunro@badgerminingcorp.com (920) 361-2388 +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +--- +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.