|
Claudia, In a message dated 8/17/00 2:10:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, cpapp@merck.com.ar writes: > I'm trying to gather information and mainly oppinions about two modules, ILM > and SMG. I'm thinking them for version 6.1.- > > Does anybody of you implemented them? Are SMG's as good as SSA told me ? > Thank you in advance for any comment. Depends upon within which context SSA told you that SMG's (Satanic Message Gateways) were good. They wouldn't replace functions for which we were using CIMPath under V5 and early V6. Don't know about ILM, but OLM has failed several places I've worked for several reasons -- the main reason being that, unlike carriers, SSA doesn't provide baseline data for things like zones, routes, carriers, etc. Do you have a specific usability question? Regards, Dean Asmussen Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc. Fuquay-Varina, NC USA E-mail: DAsmusen@aol.com "There are three levels of lying. Lies, damn lies, and statistics." -- Harry Truman +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.