|
Al Macintyre 405 CD AS/400 Mixed Mode v4r3 We generate custom turn-around job tickets to track raw material & direct labor consumption but do not yet factor in setup time or indirect labor. In some departments we have machines to handle most of the work very efficiently, with the excess done by hand which is very slow. The supervisor keeps the machines busy with whatever they can accept out of our highest priority work, then keeps direct labor busy with the excess work that is not right now on any machine, then when the supervisor has time also pitches in with indirect labor. This was clarified for me because periodically they want me to adjust the job printing program which predicts volume of job tickets appropriate to print based on standard time to product the order quantity, crew size, and some supervisor estimated needs by work center, a formula which needs tuning. However, there is a larger issue of scheduling work efficiently through our factory & capturing correct costs, The operations are routed a particular way, but sometimes the work occurs on the fast machines, sometimes on the slow by hand direct labor, sometimes via indirect supervisor, with the selection which made after the shop order paperwork hits the shop floor. If the costs were correctly captured on any given part, the variances would not make any sense to anyone after the fact. We also have a work force that is cross-trained to the point that when there is underload in one work center, some of the workers can be moved to another work center. It seems to me that I have described a level of work center rates depth that is beyond BPCS comprehension. Ideally capacity planning should know that we have a cluster of high rate machines that can handle work volume up to some load within first shift, and a mobile work force that can perform in any number of work centers on machines that are not automatic unmanned (actually we have some humans who service several machines concurrently) once setup completed, and give a fair estimate of how long some work volume should take to get through the mixed rate operations and when impending volume dictates advance warning reccommendation of overtime or 2nd shift work force on the higher speed machines, Am I expecting too much of BPCS planning, or should we be able to hold CAP to the same standards of accuracy & precision & ability to back track to which we hold INV? Al +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.