× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. BPCS-L
  3. November 1999

Re: BOM900


Does anyone have an idea why in the world V. 6.1 would require a dedicated
system and many times more capacity just run BOM900?  Version 6.1 has no
architectural changes.  If this is true, it should be logged as a
performance issue BMR.

By the way, I have never seen the need to run BOM900 as frequently as the
other re-org programs, such as (ORD990, SYS990, etc.), which are good to do
on a daily basis.  Whenever we have converted bills of material from other
systems or manually updated the MBM file, we ran BOM900 to make sure the
internal sequence nos., and low-level codes are properly set.

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.