Re: Batch Billing Performance.

[MacWheel99@xxxxxxx]

Check BPCS_L Archives
http://www.midrange.com/bpcs-l-archive
http://www.midrange.com/site-search.htm

Billing Performance = some indexes need to be added to help SQL do a better 
job
IBM Performance = there are OS/400 PTFs specifically to help BPCS performance
General Performance = any time you shift modes (e.g. mixed mode vs. client / 
server) or what box you plan to run what version of BPCS off of ... redoing 
the sizing questionnairre is advisable.

Revisit OSG occasionally - SSA does facelifts more often than they provide 
stuff that is useful to our 405 CD needs ... looks to me like V6 gets better 
support ... this weekend, thanks to a tip here on "Y2K" wars from 
Ata510@aol.com, I did revisit OSG & at least in the Y2K area for V6 the 
facelift was accompanied by some more client-friendly stuff, than when I 
visited OSG about a month ago.

In general, the state-of-art has seemed to have been:
1. Get list of BMRs for a particular version cumulative.
2. Look up individual BMRs in the list.
3. This is so tedious that we do not re-visit often enough to check on 
improvements

Al Macintyre 405 CD on V4R3 mixed mode

> Subj:  Batch Billing Performance.
>  From:    Geoff_Start@bausch.com (Geoff Start)
>  
>       Hello,
>       We are implementing V6004 with October 98 BMR bundle on an AS400 
model 
>       730 feature 2068. OS400 release is V4R3.
>       
>       Does anyone have a list of BMR numbers for Billing performance which 
>       our release won't already include? The OGS website is OK when looking 
>       for known BMR numbers and programs, but seems poor for searches on a 
>       general issue. 
>       Thanks,
>       Geoff Start
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---