|
> SQL has the coding methods to avoid poor performance, but it is very > easy to cause poor perfromance with SQL. I am new to SQL - we converted to BPCS 405 CD from BPCS/36 last year & I am covered up with lots of aftermath implications - one of which is learning how to use SQL productively. IBM just has the single 3 day SQL class & I am signed up for it I guess what I will need is good reference materials that advise how best to program in SQL/400 that avoids the bad practices of which you speak. May I presume that those of you doing analysis of your perfomance dogs are discovering that the inexperienced SQL programmers are apparently on the staff of SSA & that these problems are not purely in-house errors of omission, so that OSQ will have lists of upgrades needed? There is another problem. We have end users creating queries. They are able to figure out which file contains the data they need, thanks to the wonders of external file descriptions, but my end users are not using the available logicals - it is almost too much to ask that a non-programmer comprehend their importance & the performance hit taken by not using them. Al +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.