× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: BPCS 6.04 Full Client Server AS/400 Performance vs. 6.04 Mixed Mode Performance
  • From: Dwight Slessman <dslessman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:24:16 -0400
  • Organization: National Electrical Carbon Products, Inc.

Comparing interactive workload between Full Client Server and Mixed Mode is 
not a comparison.  By definition client server does not have any 
interactive.  Interactive processing as defined by IBM for AS/400 Servers 
basically means green-screen access to the AS/400.  This could be with dumb 
terminals, using client access, or Telnet.

It would be interesting however, to see a comparison of the full client 
server versus mixed mode with the same transaction volumn thrown at 
comparable AS/400(s) (you would actually have two different styles of 
AS/400 for c/s versus mixed mode).

Dwight Slessman


-----Original Message-----
From:   dleising@whittman-hart.com [SMTP:dleising@whittman-hart.com]
Sent:   Monday, June 28, 1999 1:50 PM
To:     BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject:        BPCS 6.04 Full Client Server AS/400 Performance vs. 6.04 
Mixed   Mode Performance



Is there anyone out there who could provide any incite into
AS/400 performance comparisons between BPCS 6.04 Full
Client Server vs. BPCS 6.04 Mixed Mode. I am specifically
interested in interactive performance load on the AS/400.
In other words which version (6.04 Full Client Server or
6.04 Mixed Mode) would generate the most AS/400
interactive load assuming the same AS/400 resources
were made available to either version and the same
interactive transaction volume were applied to either
version. What would the interactive performance factor
between the versions be?

 Dick Leising


+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.