RE: Version 4.05CD Question

["Carlos Blanco" <carlos.blanco@xxxxxxxx>]

My company has work in a implementation in 1 customer with 4.05 CD,
but he has other solutions for Y2K problem. For example, use a tool
for make direcly the modificacions in sources, or other fast solution
is use a "encapsulation" solution. This product has a simulation to work
28 years ago. The year 2000 is same a the year 1972. In the files the
information is 28 years ago, but user work in real date in displays or
reports.

Excuse for my bad english.

Carlos Blanco

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]En
> nombre de accomplice
> Enviado el: miércoles, 24 de marzo de 1999 17:44
> Para: BPCS-L@midrange.com
> Asunto: Version 4.05CD Question
>
>
> I am curious as to how many people elected to use 4.05CD instead of the
> other Y2K compliant options.
>
>
>
> +---
> | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> +---
>

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---