Re: Y2K Blowup - ADK

[Lisa Abney <abney@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Speaking of ADK (ASSET) ... we have a custom-written ADK program that uses %NOD
(number of days since beginning of century) that has started giving really 
strange
results since 1/1/99.  Anyone else seen anything like that?  I have to think 
it's
Y2K related, but haven't figured out why.

Ata510@aol.com wrote:

> And just one more word of caution to add to all of this Y2K talk. Those of you
> using ADK (ASSET) for writing applications, and who used ADK date routines
> should be careful to get 6.004 ADK, and recompile any programs that used date
> functions. There is even 1 Y2K BMR that recently was input for this ADK
> release (for EDATE function). 6.004 ADK is the ONLY Y2K compliant version of
> that product. But - at least upgrades are free.
>
> Thanks
> +---
> | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> +---



+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---