A New BPCS Forum

[DAsmussen@xxxxxxx]

Sorry, folks.  This message got "bounced" because it contained the "S" word.
Majordomo thought that it was a subscription request.  The new forum seems
pretty good, as the answers are always available (we haven't been able to
resolve the privacy issues for the BPCS-L archives), but the cookies drive me
_NUTS_!  The following is edited for "s"-ing -- Dean.

In a message dated 98-10-23 00:01:09 EDT, owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com writes:

> I checked out the new BPCS forum, but am a little confused.  Any ideas why
>  someone thought another forum was necessary?  Do they intend to have a
>  different focus than BPCS-L?  Several of the questions/comments posted
there
>  were the same as from this list the last few days - that's kind of
>  redundant.  (Personally,  I like being able to subsc***e to this as a list
-
>  it's easier then navigating through the threaded messages there!.)
>  
>  Mark Curtis wrote:
>  
>  > You should check out -
>  >
>  > http://135.145.192.76/bpcs.htm
>  >
>  > Looks like its going to be a good forum.