× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: AS/400 System pools for GUI
  • From: "Hancock, Teri" <THANCOCK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 08:26:09 -0500

 We are currently in the last stages of testing before we go "live" with
BPCS 6.04 on an IBM 530.  We will be running in mixed-mode.  

Question:  What have been the guidelines used to determine the amount System
Pool Size required to run the Order Entry GUI modules?  

Thanks

Teri Hancock
Accuride Corporation  

 

-----Original Message-----
From: DAsmussen@aol.com
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Sent: 9/25/98 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: BPCS 6.04 Security

Marie,

In a message dated 98-09-24 09:00:56 EDT, you write:

> Does anyone have a matrix of how BPCS 6.04 security works.  It seems
>  that if the user is tagged as S then it does not check any further.
If
>  the user is U then the signon screen sometimes takes 1 minute.  Could
it
>  be a logical file issue??

I am unaware of anything that would affect 6.04 security as far as
signon
delay time is concerned.  Of course, I'm running 6.0.02.  The only
significant
difference between 5.1.01 (which we _WERE_ running) and 6.0.02 has been
the
action code and function key-level security in certain programs.
Neither of
the latter should affect signon speed.  Have you checked the joblog of
the
users that are taking so long to sign on?  We upgraded to OS/400 V4R1 on
our
production box last weekend, and suddenly started getting "Unable to
allocate
object Qsumpinsumpinsumpin" messages during S/O release (no, it's _NOT_
a 19
character object name, I just couldn't remember the _REAL_ object name).
The
message was in the joblog, but did not appear to the user nor did it
appear in
the system log nor the system operator message queue.  We filed a
complaint
with 1-800-WE'LL GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT (IBM Service) this morning.

The slow user's joblog might provide some insight, I don't see any way
that
BPCS could be causing the problem...

HTH,

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-Mail:  DAsmussen@aol.com

"I wish people who had trouble communicating would just shut up." -- Tom
Lehrer
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.