RE: BPCS 6.04 on an AS400 Model 300/2042

["Hillock, Chris" <CHillock@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We are not on 6.04, but if you want to improve your response time
noticeably, you should get off of the CISC machine and move to RISC
technology, and a more current version of OS/400.  We went to risk about
two years ago and the difference was remarkable.  You should really
consider moving to a 510, 530, 600, 620, 170 or an S model. ESPECIALLY,
if you want to run a Client-server/mixed-mode application like 6.04 with
any kind of acceptable response time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kubota.Judy@orbital.com [mailto:Kubota.Judy@orbital.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 10:21 AM
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject: BPCS 6.04 on an AS400 Model 300/2042



Anyone out there running BPCS 6.04 (or 6.02) mixed mode on an IBM AS/400
Model 300/2042?

We are currently implementing BPCS 6.04 mixed mode on an AS/400 E45 with
80MB memory.

Response time is very slow.  We are looking at upgrading to a model 300
with 180MB memory.  Wanted to see if anyone out there is running on a
like
system and what their response time looks like.  Acceptable?

Judy Kubota.
kubota.judy@orbital.com
(909) 593-3581 ext 2368


+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---