RE: BPCS 6.02... -Reply

Hey Folks!

This was "bounced" from the list, I included my response at the bottom:

Dean

From: GaryWWest@aol.com
Message-ID: <313d2701.34d5454e@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 23:02:20 EST
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: BPCS 6.02... -Reply
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 49

 
> If you're seeing "pretty good performance", you must have a "pretty small"
> database for V6.  We have over 250,000 BOM records, and BOM300 takes over
> two  minutes to bring up even a single-level inquiry. >>

BOM300 has an SQL statement that joins MBM with IWM and (if i remember
correctly) IWI. This single SQL statement destroys performance for BOM300. I
have modifiied this single line of code for all of my clients and then get
sub-second responses for this program. Check into it.

gary west

Yes it does.  The comment, as usual, is "... to enhance performance in the
UNIX environment, no effect plus or minus on the AS/400".  Unfortunately, my
primary client has a policy of not "taking ownership" of base BPCS code unless
we need to make a change to it based on business rules.  BOM300 requires no
such change, and no user will pay the fee to have it fixed when they want so
many other things worse...

Regards,

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-Mail:  DAsmussen@aol.com

"Always take a job that is too big for you." -- Harry Emerson Fosdick
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "BPCS-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---