Jerome, Sorry for the delay, we have a new plant coming up on BPCS Monday, November 10! I haven't had any non-billable time available at the client site to reply. In a message dated 97-11-04 06:45:26 EST, you write: > Dean -- > > Sounds like you're running 6.0.2 AS/SET, but with what version of > Set/TURN? We are currently at AS/SET 5.2.01, TO 4.1, ST V2.6, which only > says it requires V2R3, TO 4.1, and AS/SET V4.00.01. Can you confirm this > TO/ST setup will work if we upgrade AS/SET to v6.0.2? You are correct on both counts. I checked the Set/Turn version window and got the same results that you did. I don't know if we installed a patch that just didn't update the "requirements" data within Set/Turn, or if the old version still works. Unfortunately, the person primarily responsible for the upgrade is no longer around (which begs my continuing lament -- "Treat your people right, or _LOSE_ them.") > We're on RISC boxes. Because of your ADD mention, are you on CISC? > Thought ADD was only available for CISC, still would think if the AS/SET, > TO/ST combo works for CISC, it will also work for RISC. We _have_ ADD on our development 320 (4-way), but that doesn't mean that we _use_ ADD. Our production box is a RISC 530, but we have no development tools installed. I included the ADD reference only for those foolish enough to waste their time using it. The first time it showed me the wrong contents for a variable (multiple views of the same file in the same program), I told everyone at the site to quit using it -- and they did. > Also, have you seen differences in 6.0.2 other than the increased > extension line support? This is the reason we would like to put the > release up, so we can stop squeezing long SQL statements into a measly 5 > lines. SEVERAL new % functions have been added, many of which are used in BPCS V6.x.xx. We really haven't had time to evaluate the new functions, but we needed ADK 6.0.2 for BPCS 6.0.02PLF++++. Manuals are no longer available, you have to pull them off of the CD-ROM. As usual, we've found some functions that _USED_ to work w/in the syntax checker (can't remember which obscure ones they were off the top of my head), but no longer do. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions... Dean Asmussen Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc. Fuquay-Varina, NC USA E-Mail: DAsmussen@aol.com "So a man said to God, 'What's a million years to you?' God replied 'It's a second.' So the man asked of God, 'What's a million dollars to you?' God replied, 'A penny'. So the man said to God 'Will you give me a penny?' God said 'Yes I will -- in a second.' " -- Unknown +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "BPCS-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com | and specify 'unsubscribe BPCS-L' in the body of your message. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: firstname.lastname@example.org +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.