Re: Mapping SQL Result Sets to Browsers -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Mapping SQL Result Sets to Browsers
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <thunderaxiom@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:58:30 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Aaron Bartell skrev den 07-07-2008 18:41:

thing. I don't pass SQL result sets because they aren't part of the Java
Collection hierarchy. What that basically equates to is that I can't easily

A ResultSet is not an independent entity and is not a JavaBean.

I have not used it myself but understood that the RowSet introduced in JDBC 2.0 is a JavaBean and has a subclass which can be used without the database connection.

http://java.sun.com/developer/Books/JDBCTutorial/chapter5.html

Anybody who has experience with these?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.