× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Buck... ALL of your points are valid. But I think you can agree that the points I've made are valid as well. (I'm not sure you can use tn5250 as an HMC).

I was very upset when we purchased a new box and software licenses, and then discovered I had to buy more software because RDi "wasn't included". Heck, my IBM business partner didn't even know (and they use RDi/WDSC in house).

I'm guessing... but the thought process at IBM was something like "It's a PC software, therefore it must be licensed like PC software"

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Buck Calabro
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 4:00 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi way ahead

On 3/8/2017 3:04 PM, Greg Wilburn wrote:
But what it doesn't address those of us who purchase ONE machine with the OS, compilers, etc.

It used to. Someone at IBM thought it would be a better idea to reveal the cost of RDi separate from the rest of the development software.

Why would someone logically purchase the compilers without an editor?

If the NYS DMV deploy their application as source members with a script to customise, configure and build the thing on a site by site basis, each of those hundred machines would need a compiler, but not an editor.

Before you throw the tomatoes, you did ask - and this is a real scenario. Strange, but real.

As far as client access goes - you need at least one license to manage the machine.

I use tn5250 - an alternative, free, open source program. And have for years, maybe decades - it's been a long long time. I bring this up not to be argumentative, but to relate something an IBMer told me many years ago, when I was at a technical conference. Complaining, as is my wont.
About SEU and how rudimentary it is. Was. Is. You know. He told me that IBM deliberately left SEU in a barely useful state in order to encourage third party vendors to make something better, and thus grow the IBM software market.

There /are/ alternatives to RDi and IBM i Access. Throw a couple of Euros to Mihael Schmidt for his RDi-like editor. Small, lightweight, and he does good work.

--
--buck

Try wiki.midrange.com!

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.