× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Richard

I don't know as I would recommend one logger over another. I have used
log4j, but when it came time to look at logging for .NET, I just started
using what was in the .NET Framework.

My thinking is that there is one less non-Framework DLL to distribute,
manage, update, etc.

It looks like most of the logging frameworks offer similar features, so if
you're very much accustomed to one, it may not make sense to change to
another.

Craig

-----Original Message-----
From: systemidotnet-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:systemidotnet-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Schoen
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:05 AM
To: systemidotnet@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [SystemiDotNet] Logging (log4net et al)

Bueller ? :-)

Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business
Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT

-----Original Message-----


message: 1
date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:04:13 -0500
from: Richard Schoen <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [SystemiDotNet] Logging (log4net et al)

Craig,

Do you recommend the Framework logger ?

We've been using one called BitFactory for several years and my guys are
pushing to use the Framework logging.

http://www.theobjectguy.com/dotnetlog

Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business
Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT

------------------------------

message: 4
date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:29:26 -0700
from: "Craig Pelkie" <craig@xxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [SystemiDotNet] Logging (log4net et al)

FWIW, this has some info about the .NET Framework logging.

http://www.iprodeveloper.com/article/other-languages/logging-and-listening-6
5241

Craig Pelkie





------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SystemiDotNet mailing list
SystemiDotNet@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/systemidotnet


End of SystemiDotNet Digest, Vol 6, Issue 13
********************************************


--
This is the .net use with the System i (SystemiDotNet) mailing list To post
a message email: SystemiDotNet@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/systemidotnet
or email: SystemiDotNet-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/systemidotnet.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.