× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I always use 32-bit integers (10i 0). They are the fastest to increment, and you're not really saving any effort or making the code more readable (or anything else that I can fathom) by using a 3,0 packed decimal. (Indeed, if anything, you're making the code more difficult to maintain because anyone who tries a number higher than 998 will have problems, and will have to stop and troubleshoot the new bug he's created... )

What value do you derive from using 3p0? What advantage does it give you? (Saves you 2 bytes of memory! LOL!)


On 7/2/2012 1:43 PM, Dave wrote:
Hi everyone,

A coworker got caught out by the For EndFor loop.

D wI S 3 0

For wI = 1 to %elem(arrayWith999Elements)

etc.
EndFor;

I said it was normal at the end that wI should be incremented to 1000,
thus making the program crash.

I wondered what the normal way would be to avoid this. I always use 5I
0 for my array index.
The coworker changed the DIM setting to 998!




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.