Re: NOUNREF option -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: NOUNREF option
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:46:28 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 4/6/2012 10:02 AM, Alan Campin wrote:

I have been using since 6.1 and have not had any issues. It leaves a
lot of garbage out of the programs although the static storage is
still sky high. Still cannot figure out why a RPG/ILE program using
the MAIN keyword, a single procedure doing nothing and NOUNREF used
with no debugging information needs 4k of static storage. The same
thing in a C program needs 270 bytes.

Because RPG is not C?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: NOUNREF option , Alan Campin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.