Joe and Jon,
if I would follow your argumentation, then a lot of small ISVs, that have done a good work in the past could close their business.
Our customer's desire for graphical user interfaces was the reason why RPG programmers have to worry about OA.
That is why I've asked our local IBM representatives for a tool, that saves the tens of thousands hours of work that have been invested to write logic that fits our customer's needs.
But how can one convince a customer to invest in software, that is needed to modernize existing programs and pay tens of thousands of bucks for it, if he only pays a fraction of it on the license fees for his ERP.
To rewrite all these things, that have been developed in the past goes beyond the cost.
It is not a question of having the will to invest in training on new methods, but a question of time and money.
But there is another reason why the use of these tools from Profound, Look etc. are problematic: most things work quite fine when you have rebuilt your apps, but you also know, that developing these apps is the major task for ISVs.
There is too little support for the concerns of ISVs.
So remember: if I would follow your argumentation, then a lot of small ISVs, that have done a good work in the past could close their business.
Bernd Dworrak, Dipl.-Phys.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Jon Paris
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2012 23:47
An: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: Open Access to be generally available as part of the RPG compiler
On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:57 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Now that OA is free, I think it's got the potential to really be a
great tool for a number of things. Some will still see it as a way to
modernize existing 5250 programs and I don't think that's a good use
of the tool except in the hands of dedicated modernization vendors.
But it certainly has the potential to allow enterprising developers to
provide access (there's that word!) to technologies that RPG
programmers might not otherwise be willing to invest in.
This is getting scary Joe - I couldn't agree with you more.
Jon Paris
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
midrange.com
