× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Probably most shops are this way, and it is hard to get away from in an existing databse, but you can get essentially the same level of independence with RLA as you can using SQL. Instead of reading the physical, use LFs and explicitly specify the fields in the LF. You can then change the underlying physical and no program need to be recompiled.

However, I personally find explicit field specification in SQL (SELECT fieldname, fieldname, as opposed to SELECT *) to be easier.

Sam

On 11/18/2010 6:32 PM, Alan Campin wrote:

When you use RLA, unless you externalize your I/O somehow (which almost no
one know how to do and won't use it even if you did), you are bringing the
entire record into the program which in effect, locks the table to change.

That means the next time you need to change the table you have to recompile
every program that uses it and very quickly no wants to recompile 500
programs so they start creating extension tables or reusing fields or god
knows what.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.