× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



James Perkins wrote:
It seems that the invocation of subprocedures in a service program
significantly slows down performance. I invoke 2 subprocedures on each write
to the stream file, a replace all subprocedure and the write line
subprocedure. So, for the question, what kind of overhead is there when
invoking subprocedures from a service program? I'm sure there is information
on this, I just can't seem to find it.

I'm sure there is SOME overhead in calling a procedure in a service program ... but it's negligible at best (I'm pretty sure this has been discussed here or in MIDRANGE-L before).

The majority of code I write these days is almost 80% procedures in service programs ... and I haven't had a performance problem at all.

Are you doing anything funky in the service programs ... reclaiming activation groups, setting on LR, etc?

How is your service program defined as far as activation groups? *CALLER, named, *NEW?

david


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.