×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Just food for thought here, but you might want to leave the second parm in the statement for the following reasons:
- It is self-documenting. If there is a problem with that line of code some day, a future programmer would immediately know that the statement is expecting a date in *ISO format.
- Your code works without specifying parm 2 in the following condition: today, on that machine. Not specifying parm 2 means that the system is using defaults to interpret the value into a date. Some day there might be a need to change a system value or add an H-spec that could cause this line of code to fail. Specifying parm 2 forces the statement to use the date as it is expected in the database. Remember, too, that defaults on other machines might not be what you expect. Of course, if you can guarantee that the code will only run on this one machine, then...never mind.
Hope that helps,
--Bruce Guetzkow
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This thread ...
Re: %date not evaluating in DOW as "I" would expect, (continued)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
