× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Joep, you beat me to it ;-)

Peter Colpaert
Application Developer
PLI - IT - Kontich, Belgium
-----
Yoda of Borg are we. Futile is resistance, assimilated will you be.
-----



Joep Beckeringh <joep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
28/11/2007 15:08
Please respond to
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: 00:00:00 or 24:00:00






That makes sense, because the date part is equal. How about this:

D time1 S Z inz(z'2000-01-01-24.00.00.000000')
D time2 S Z inz(z'2000-01-02-00.00.00.000000')
D equal S N
D diff S 10I 0
/free
equal = (time1 = time2);
dsply equal;
diff = %diff(time1:time2:*MS);
dsply diff;
*inlr = *on;
/end-free

According to IBM they're not equal, but the difference in milliseconds is
0.

Joep Beckeringh


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.