Re: SELECT & WHENEQ Question

"Wilt, Charles" wrote:

...
You could certainly do it, but you'd have to short-circuit the for loop
with LEAVE since the for loop really isn't the controlling factor.
Plus you'd have to code to set W@GOOD to 'NO' if you make it all the way
through the loop.  The result is ugly, and not clear as to why your are
doing what you are doing.
...

It's interesting to consider the possible solutions if there were 50
possible values for K@FAC rather than just 3.  Using a nested loop would
get nasty.  Terri's current solution would possibly be better, since
it's flat, even though it's kind of ugly.  But a regular loop over the
values would be best (imho, best even with 3 possible values).

W@GOOD = *blank;
i = 1;
dow W@GOOD = *blank;
   K@FAC = candidate(i);
   exsr $100;
   i = i + 1;
enddo;
if W@GOOD = *blank;
   W@GOOD = 'NO';
endif;