× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Jon -

 >> That really simplies the equation.

Does it?  I can't help wondering.  If you "simplify" to the point that a
knowledge of algebra is needed before you can understand the relationship of
the code to the original requirement ... then haven't you obfuscated rather
than simplified?

The version ( ( FieldA - 1 ) / FieldA ) * 100 is a direct representation of
the original requirement and there can't be a lot of difference performance
wise.

I agree with you, except for one issue which I haven't seen mentioned (or missed seeing). Because of the intermediate field length issues on divide operations, I would move the divide to the end ...

( ( FieldA - 1) * 100 ) / FieldA

Since the compiler cannot generate a field with an infinite number of decimal places, it is always best to eliminate or minimize divide operations, and keep them as late in the equation as possible.

Ken
http://www.ke9nr.net/
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of my employer or anyone in their right mind.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.