|
The stand alone ReadExample() is doing two things at once.
I disagree. It does one thing: it reads a record. Whether or not some condition prevents that record from being read (error, lock, eof, etc) is a natural result of that one thing.
When you have the separate MoreRecords() subprocedure, you're doing one thing, but you've split it across two subprocedures -- which is exactly why you need to communicate the "end of file" condition from ReadExample() to MoreRecords() -- the reason they have to know about each other is because they're sharing a task.
Just my opinion, of course.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
