|
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 15:35, Joe Pluta wrote: > Hm. This is counter to what I always understood. In my understanding, > there were two different pieces to any program: the code and the data. > While each job got its own data portion, the code portion was shared, > the caveat being you had to be in the same memory pool. Hmmm... maybe the term "copy" is incorrect. It is actually the activation that gets created, which includes memory management allocation and techie things like that. I'm not sure if each activation actually copys the service program object or not... since activation groups are intended to divide and manage memory resources, they are largely independent of themselves (but subservient to the job). At this point, I think my head is going to explode regarding activation groups... I'm having trouble organizing a coherent thought... :-) Joel http://www.rpgnext.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
