Re: *INZSR - I still love you!!!

Hi James,

> In a recent post, someone said something that lead me to believe
> we're all supposed to be trying to get rid of *INZSR.  I know it
> isn't "politically correct RPG, but frankly I always thought it was
> kind of neat to have a routine that executed automagically during
> the first cycle only.

What is *INZSR so different from the methods(?) that are "called"
automatically when a new object in an OO language is created?

To populate some variables with a more sophisticated logic as INZ()
will be the most likely task of both, or?

As long as we use RPG, we should use it at its best. When we get and
get knowledge of better languages/methods/ways, we should evaluate to
use them. (I think Hans' mails are having effect :-) That's just fair
to the customer paying us!

> But then again, I like grits with eggs and sausage instead of hash
> browns - go figure!!

What are hash browns? Drugs? In the morning? :-)

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / best regards

Anton Gombkötö
Organisation und Projektleitung

Avenum Technologie GmbH
Wien - Salzburg - Stuttgart
http://www.avenum.com