Re: Another one bites the dust

rpg400-l-request@midrange.com wrote:

>  10. Re: Another one bites the dust (Douglas Handy)
>
>That's the way it's always been.  Didn't we just have a thread about this
>recently?  The only way that would be allowed is if the feature was also
>released to the back level OS versions as part of a PTF.  While not
>unprecedented, it is the *very* rare exception and not the norm.   A very
>welcome exception was the PTFs to add *SrcStmt and *NoDebugIO options to the H
>spec.
>
>If it can't be recompiled on the target release, you can't move it to the 
>target
>release.  Period.  No amount of wishing is going to change that.  I had to code
>to V3R2 features for years, but I still welcomed the progression of the 
>language
>and tried to stay current on the language changes.

Sure, but Joe isn't asking to use new %bifs nor to use new features that need 
new run-time routines nor new machine instructions. He just wants to use a 
different format for his source records. It seems to me that the compiled 
object will be exactly the same in this case, so target release seems like a 
strange constraint.

It's almost as if you're saying that the actual V4R4 compiler will be used just 
because he says TGTRLS(V4R4M0)!!!

Oh... wait... Never mind.  :-)

Tom Liotta

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertechgroup.com


__________________________________________________________________
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! 
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com/