Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
Bob Cozzi wrote: > Do you mean that because a VARYING field is usually set to a length that > is at or close to the same length of the data, that the result is that > %trim has to do less work and therefore finishes quicker (typically) > than when it works with a fixed length field? Since %TRIM() is often used to determine the length of a string, and since varying length variables hold the actual length, %TRIM() is generally unnecessary when doing string operations on varying length values. (BTW, I'm sure it would be possible to improve the performance of %TRIM() for the worst cases, with some degradation of performance for the best cases. But you'd *never* get to the same level of performance that you'd get by using varying length character variables.) Hans
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.